Advisor to conservative group forced to resign after making reference to self defense

[MrA]

Originally Posted by Richard

I do not, and never have supported Redwatch. I personally do not believe Redwatch is run for the benefit of Nationalists.

I never said you supported it, I said that the racialist element where AWARE of it. Huge difference there, I'm pleased to note that you don't support it.

I should not need to remind you that redwatch is not alone in publishing the details of its so called ideological opponents.

Your lot are at it too Mr A.

My lot? And who are my lot? You really have to stop this Richard, I could easily state that C18 were your lot, but that wouldn't be true now would it?

[Jake Featherston]

Originally Posted by Daryle Lamont Jenkins

North Carolina has slightly more liberals. It's a trend that's been going on for a few years now.

Lots of liberals & Democrats own guns too, you know. For example, when I was in North Carolina, most of the Black people I knew owned guns, just like the Whites. I knew a Black guy who went raccoon hunting pretty much every weekend. He had a freezer full of raccoon skins. I was unclear why he considered a freezer full of raccoon skins a desirable possession, however.

[Jake Featherston]

Originally Posted by MrA

A) yes it is and B) Yes it is. I never said it was illegal..

I never said you said it was illegal. But I'm not precisely certain how one objectively determines whether or not an act is "justified." Keeping in mind that "justified" is derived from "justice," it seems noteworthy that the prevailing system of criminal justice does not proscribe such an action.

[Daryle Lamont Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Jake Featherston

Lots of liberals & Democrats own guns too, you know. For example, when I was in North Carolina, most of the Black people I knew owned guns, just like the Whites. I knew a Black guy who went raccoon hunting pretty much every weekend. He had a freezer full of raccoon skins. I was unclear why he considered a freezer full of raccoon skins a desirable possession, however.

Yeah, I have been noting that trend for years, but you still have those liberals that are still on the anti-gun thing. And while I am one of those liberal gun owners, I would submit that blacks in general are more conservative than is said, so that wouldn't be surprising. I would say however that a lot of people are anti-gun in urban areas because they are concerned about the gun violence or cops who already have a hard time telling the difference between a child holding a candy bar and a gun. I'm not saying I support the anti-gun legislation, but I do understand where it's coming from.

[Richard]

Originally Posted by MrA

My lot? And who are my lot?

Anti-racists, Anti-fascists, Anti-whites, or whatever you lot call yourselves these days.

[MrA]

Originally Posted by Richard

Anti-racists, Anti-fascists, Anti-whites, or whatever you lot call yourselves these days.

Richard, you're falling into that trap of grouping people again. I take it then that your lot are a bunch of rabid Nazi Jew murdering bastards. If we're going to generalise that is.

So which of "my lot" distribute personal information on idealogical opponents. Be specific....

[Richard]

Originally Posted by MrA

Richard, you're falling into that trap of grouping people again. I take it then that your lot are a bunch of rabid Nazi Jew murdering bastards. If we're going to generalise that is.

So which of "my lot" distribute personal information on idealogical opponents. Be specific....

When people on here and elsewhere stop generalising I will do the same. Until then it will remain "us" and "them".

[MrA]

Originally Posted by Richard

When people on here and elsewhere stop generalising I will do the same. Until then it will remain "us" and "them".

Don't be so soft and behave yourself. You're the guilty party here mate. So I can take it that my "lot" don't participate in this because my "lot" has not been defined.

[SmokeOnTheWater]

Originally Posted by Richard

When people on here and elsewhere stop generalising I will do the same. Until then it will remain "us" and "them".

And we could say the same. Eyzwydopen calls anti-racists "pee chuckers" for example, so by your principle we'd be justified in calling all nationalists Nazis and Jew murderers.

Where's it going to stop? Only when someone decides to put a stop to it.

I suggest here, now.

[Richard]

Originally Posted by SmokeOnTheWater

And we could say the same. Eyzwydopen calls anti-racists "pee chuckers" for example, so by your principle we'd be justified in calling all nationalists Nazis and Jew murderers.

Where's it going to stop? Only when someone decides to put a stop to it.

I suggest here, now.

An Interesting proposition. I'll go with it for the moment.